Saturday, February 14, 2009

Lots of Kisses Today

FROM CNN: When your lips gently brush against the mouth of your beloved this Valentine's Day, it may feel magically romantic, or sloppily slobbery, or blissfully gentle, or perhaps too rough and toothy.

Regardless, the practice of kissing is nearly universal. It is practiced in at least 90 percent of cultures among sexual or romantic partners, experts say. Now, scientists are investigating the biological factors underlying that ubiquitous expression of love.

The science of kissing even has a name: philematology. Research on the subject was presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science in Chicago on Friday.

"Kissing is not just kissing. It is a major escalation or de-escalation point in a powerful process of mate choice," said Helen Fisher, professor at Rutgers University and author of the book "Why Him, Why Her: Finding Real Love by Understanding Your Personality Type." Visit CNNhealth, your connection for better living

A study by Gordon Gallup Jr., professor of psychology at the University of Albany, showed that 59 percent of men and 66 percent of women reported that after feeling attracted to another person initially, the attraction ended after the first kiss, Fisher said.

Looking at a sample of more than 1,000 college students, Gallup and colleagues found that women also tend to emphasize kissing more than men, and are much more likely to insist on kissing before a sexual encounter.

A person receives information about the person he or she is smooching by locking lips, Fisher said. A kiss transmits smells, tastes, sound and tactile signals that all affect how the individuals perceive each other and, ultimately, whether they will want to kiss again.

Women tend to be attracted to male partners with a different immune system makeup from their own, Fisher said. They subconsciously detect information about a partner's immune system through smell during kissing, she said.

Research led by Wendy Hill, professor of neuroscience at Lafayette College, looked at how kissing affects the hormones oxytocin, sometimes called the "love hormone," which is associated with social bonding, and cortisol, a measure of stress.

The first experiment, which took place in a student health center, looked at college students age 18 to 22, and examined hormone levels in 15 heterosexual couples. In the control group, participants held hands and talked with their partner while music played. In the experimental group, participants were told to open-mouth kiss their partner for the length of the music -- 16 minutes.

The results showed that oxytocin levels in the women decreased after the session, but increased in the men. Researchers had expected those levels to go up in both genders; the decrease for women may have resulted from the artificial setting of the student health center, researchers theorize.

A second experiment in a more romantic setting -- a secluded room with jazz music, flowers and electric candles -- looked at nine heterosexual couples and three lesbian couples.

Researchers found that the longer the relationship of a couple, the more the cortisol levels declined in both partners. The heterosexual women, moreover, said they felt greater intimacy with their partners than the heterosexual men or the homosexual women did, while all groups expressed equal satisfaction in kissing their partners. The researchers are in the process of analyzing oxytocin levels in this experiment.

On the basis of brain imaging, Fisher proposes that there are three distinct brain systems involved in mating and reproduction: sex drive, romantic love, and attachment. Sex drive compels us to seek partners, romantic love tells us to commit to one, and attachment helps us "tolerate this person at least long enough" to have a child, she said. Kissing evolved to stimulate all three of these systems, she said.

Kissing "can really either escalate a relationship or really kill it," Fisher said.

We feel such sensitivity to kissing partially because of the way our brain is structured, Fisher said. The somatosensory cortex, which extends from one side of the brain to the other, has a large portion devoted to picking up signals from the lips, tongue, nose and cheek areas around the mouth.

"You can really get poked in the back and not feel it very much, but just a feather around your lips and you really do feel it," she said.

As for the origins of kissing, one theory is that kissing evolved as an extension of the way mothers used to feed their children. Early humans, who lacked jars of manufactured baby food, probably chewed up food and directly transferred it from their mouths to the babies', Gallup wrote.

-NewsAnchorMom Jen

Friday, February 13, 2009

RLS During Pregnancy

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A study indicates that estrogen plays an important role in triggering restless legs syndrome (RLS) during pregnancy, researchers from Germany report in the journal Sleep. "We, for the first time, have quite direct evidence that RLS in pregnancy ... is obviously directly related to hormonal changes (estrogens)," Dr. Thomas Pollmächer, principal investigator on the study, noted in an email to Reuters Health.

In the study, ten pregnant women with RLS and nine pregnant healthy "controls" provided blood samples and underwent overnight sleep-lab studies during the third trimester of pregnancy and again three months after delivery.
Eight of the ten RLS patients reported experiencing restless-legs symptoms before the present pregnancy, and all ten described worsening symptoms during pregnancy. According to the investigators, women with RLS showed significantly higher estrogen levels during pregnancy compared to the control group.

Other pregnancy-related hormone levels did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Estrogens are so-called neuroactive steroid hormones; they are important not only for conception and pregnancy but also act directly in the brain, noted Pollmächer, at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich. This finding in pregnant women might help us to understand RLS in general, he said, "and ultimately lead to an additional route for the development of treatment."

I don't get restless leg, but I do get the worst insomnia during pregnancy. I always think I am going to get addicted to Ambien, but as soon as I deliver, the insomnia is gone. Strange!

-NewsAnchorMom Jen

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Autism-Vaccine Ruling

FROM ABC: A special court has dealt a big blow to parents who blame vaccines for their kids' autism. Doctors hope Thursday's special court ruling puts an end to the fierce debate over a possible link between certain children's vaccines and autism.

Dr. Bill Schaffner, Chairman - Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University "Parents can be reassured the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine which every child should get is not associated with autism." The decision is a stunning setback for the 5 thousand families who filed claims seeking compensation for their children's autism. Schaffner said "The families will have to digest this ruling, of course, and some will be persuaded by the logic of the judges, others perhaps not."

But the court has yet to rule on legal challenges from other families who claim thimerosal, a preservative in some other vaccines is to blame. Actress Jenny McCarthy, whose son Evan has autism, told Good Morning America last year that she believes the vaccines *could* be the cause.

Jenny McCarthy, actress GMA 9/29/08 from GMA 6/4/08 interview "We believe that vaccines need to take a closer look at what the ingredients are." Opponents are already attacking the court's logic. In a statement the group Talk About Curing Autism says. "If the government can not definitively tell us the cause of autism, they can not tell us what doesn't cause autism either. This fight is not over."

But it began in part because there is still no scientific explanation for what causes the disorder or why there has been a spike in its prevalence. According to the CDC today 1 in 150 8-year-olds has autism.

-NewsAnchorMom Jen

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Gardasil Haulted

There are a lot parents who are worried the Gardasil vaccine can cause serious side effects. Merck has said time and again the drug was tested and does not pose any severe dangers like paralysis and death. Spain seems to think at least one batch of Gardasil did cause some girls to become ill. Was it just a bad batch?

Reuters: MADRID, Feb 10 - Spain's Health Ministry has ordered hospitals and chemists to temporarily halt the use of a batch of cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil, produced by drugmaker Merck & Co (MRK.N), after two girls became ill after a shot. Spain's health ministry said health services would continue to administer shots of the vaccine but ordered that the use of batch NH52670 be suspended after health authorities in Valencia region reported on Feb. 6 that two girls had become ill after receiving the injection. Merck markets the vaccine in Europe with Sanofi-Aventis SA (SASY.PA). It competes with GlaxoSmithKline Plc's (GSK.L) rival product Cervarix.

Both vaccines are designed to be given to girls and young women to protect against cancer-causing strains of the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus (HPV).
Sanofi Pasteur MSD, the Sanofi-Merck partnership that sells Gardasil in Europe, said it and health authorities were investigating what happened, but it added that an adverse event after vaccination did not mean the vaccination had caused it. "In both cases, other medical conditions (in the girls) have been observed and are being investigated which could be the cause of the reported events," said Sanofi Pasteur MSD, adding that 40 million doses of Gardasil had been distributed worldwide since its launch in 2006, without showing evidence of concerns. Simon Mather, analyst at bank WestLB, told clients the news was mildly positive for Glaxo, though in any case, Glaxo's Cervarix shot had been chosen in 80 percent of recent tenders. "

Although millions of doses have been administered worldwide without any side effects, it could strengthen Glaxo's claims for winning future tender bids with its rival cervical vaccine Cervarix if it transpires that batches or Gardasil are found to be contaminated," he said in a note.
According to the health ministry, 76,000 shots from the affected batch have already been distributed to regional authorities and chemists, who have been told to halt its sale. On Feb 3, Merck reported a 16 percent decline in quarterly sales of Gardasil and cut its expectation for the product's sales this year [ID:nN034901126]. (Reporting by Raquel Castillo; translating by Ben Harding, editing by Will Waterman)

-NewsAnchorMom Jen

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Early Gender Prediction

Wow! You can find out as soon as seven weeks if you're having a boy or a girl. That's before the parts are even visible! I found out what I was having with my first and was "surprised" with my second. I didn't realize finding out early was such a controversial thing. I guess I always thought "go for it if you want to." But $175 is a lot to spend on such a thing IMHO.


FROM ABC: $24.95 for pregnancy test+gender test kit, plus $149 gender lab fee-- results in 3-5 days from Sunnyvale Lab. Silicon valley company "Consumer Genetics" launched a new product that bundles a pregnancy test with an early DNA gender collection kit. it tests fetal d-n-a from a mother's dried blood sample... not only such consumer product on market. "Early Baby Gender Mentor" Test by maker Acu-Gen has been sued in a class-action lawsuit claiming misrepresentations regarding accuracy.

Such gender tests also pose ethical questions. Find out early-as early as seven weeks into the pregnancy! Terry Carmichael from Consumer Genetics said, "And so Sunnyvale-based company "Consumer Genetics" is capitalizing on that desire with the development of a direct-to-consumer genetic testing product that reveals a baby's gender early. It's called the "pink or blue" test. Anna Vitebsky from Consumer Genetics said, "To avoid any possible contamination of male DNA giving an in-accurate result, this super-sensitive test requires *no men* be present while the pregnant woman pricks her finger to draw a blood sample for the lab card. Consumer genetics claims an accuracy of 95-percent, or greater.

Dr. David Magnus, a Stanford Univ. biomedical ethicist says accuracy rate is not his only concern. He believes consumer tests like these could lend to gender disappointment, upsetting a woman who isn't carrying the gender she desired. But ethically even worse-- it opens the door for gender selection-- leading to abortions of the undesired child, which is a cultural issue in some countries and can skew sex ratios.

Anna Vitebsky, consumer genetics consumer genetics, insists its product was never designed for gender selection purposes. Since first launching in 2006, its lab has processed results for more than 6,000 women worldwide. because the pink or blue test is classified as non-medical, it's not regulated by any federal medical guidelines, but ethicist will be watching.

-NewsAnchorMom Jen

Monday, February 9, 2009

Kids left on School Buses

I am really worried my son will get left on a school bus or get on the wrong bus or miss the after school bus and get stuck at school. I think I am just worried about the whole bus thing in general. My oldest will be in kindergarten next year and he has the option of taking the bus. I am not ready for that. Is he? What in the world am I going to do? Maybe private school and carpooling is my answer. Has anyone else dealt with this dilemma?


BY HOI 19's Nishi Gupta: After two kids were left on a school bus within 8 days, some Peoria District 150 parents are questioning it's bus policies. It goes on the list of parent's worst nightmares. "All these things ran through my mind when I found he was left on the bus," said District 150 parent Sallie Brown.

Late last month, her son 5-year-old son Xavier, fell asleep on a school bus and missed his stop at Valeska Hinton School. His mom thinks she only learned of it because Xavier's teacher is a relative and called to find out why he wasn't in class. He was discovered by a monitor at a district bus barn.

"I don't think that's fair. They should've called me. I could've came and got him myself," said Brown. Last week, Valeska parent Terra Langfeldt's 4-year-old was left on the bus for 40 minutes. She says it wasn't until her son began screaming for help that anyone noticed."We as the parents are not doing our job correctly if we allow the district to get away with this and that's my mission right now to make sure it doesn't ever happen to another child," said Langfeldt.
The parents suggest a roll call or head count and ask why bus monitors aren't checking for kids at every stop.

According to the district there was no violation of procedure monitors are only supposed to check for kids at the bus barn. But parents say that's ridiculous."I think bus monitors should go back and forth when they drop the kids off, they should go back and check the bus or do head counts or something. not just do checks when they're back at the bus barn," said Brown.
The district spokeswoman says both incidents are closed.

She adds personnel information and disciplinary action can not be released. Meanwhile, this week both families will be reviewing video from the bus cameras.

-NewsAnchorMom Jen

Presidential Visit

I guess I was telling someone on the phone this morning that President Obama is coming HERE, the third presidential visit in just two years! It's hard to believe.

When I left for work today, my son looks at me and says, "So when is the president coming to our house?" Oh my, that would be a shocker! We must choose our words carefully!

-NewsAnchorMom Jen

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Octuplets Mom says she can do it

It has been water cooler talk all week. Why and how could a doctor put eight embryos in a single woman who already has six kids at home? I think most people would agree it sounds like a crazy scenario. The mom is speaking out saying she can take care of all 14 babies, no problem.


Here's the story from CNN:
The mother of octuplets, whose story has sparked controversy around the world, rejects suggestions that she may not be able to care adequately for all 14 of her children and that her decisions have been selfish.

"I'm providing myself to my children," Nadya Suleman told NBC in her first interview. "I'm loving them unconditionally, accepting them unconditionally, everything I do. I'll stop my life for them and be present with them and hold them and be with them. And how many parents do that? I'm sure there are many that do, but many don't. And that's unfortunate. And that is selfish."

NBC's "Today Show" ran a portion of the interview Friday.

Suleman, a 33-year-old single mother, had the octuplets through fertility treatments, while already having six young children and no clear source of income.

"I know I'll be able to afford them when I'm done with my schooling. If I were just sitting down, watching TV and not being as determined as I am to succeed and provide a better future for my children, I believe that would be considered to a certainly degree selfish," she said.

She said she plans to go back to college to pursue a degree in counseling, NBC reported. She also said all 14 children have the same biological father, a sperm donor whom she described as a friend.

A spokeswoman for Suleman has told CNN that she is being deluged with media offers but denied any suggestions that Suleman may have had a monetary incentive for having so many children.

The spokeswoman, Joann Killeen, told CNN's Larry King Live that Suleman "has no plans on being a welfare mom and really wants to look at every opportunity that she can to make sure she can provide financially for the 14 children she's responsible for now."

Suleman, in the NBC interview, complained that she is being judged differently from how couples are judged, because she is a single mother. "I feel as though I've been under the microscope because I've chosen this unconventional kind of life. I didn't intend on it being unconventional. It just turned out to be. All I wanted ... was to be a mom. That's all I ever wanted in my life."

In quotes from the interview NBC posted on its Web site, Suleman linked her decision to what she felt was missing from her youth.

"That was always a dream of mine, to have a large family, a huge family, and I just longed for certain connections and attachments with another person that I really lacked, I believe, growing up," she said. Asked what was lacking, she cited a "feeling of self and identity ... I felt powerless. And that gave me a sense of predictability. Reflecting back on my childhood, I know it wasn't functional. It was pretty dysfunctional, and whose isn't?"

Of the octuplets' birth, Suleman said she had been hoping to have one more child and had six embryos implanted, two of which led to twins.

She said she knew she would not selectively reduce. "Sometimes we have that dream and that passion and we take risks. And I did and it turned out perfectly."

The babies were born nine weeks premature, but all survived.

risks for the mother and the babies. Risks for the children include bleeding in the brain, intestinal problems, developmental delays and lifelong learning disabilities. Suleman said her fertility specialist told her about risks for the children. But she did not want to have only one or two embryos implanted. "Of course not, I wanted them all transferred. Those are my children. And that's what was available and I used them. I took a risk. It's a gamble. It always is."

What are your thoughts after hearing what the mom has to say?

-NewsAnchorMom Jen


 
Template by lollybloggerdesigns. Design by Taylor Johnston.